Tidy Stourbridge: Sunday 2nd April, Bagley Street Car Park, Lye

Great work from members of the community, including Labour councillors and party members!

Tidy Stourbridge

A beautiful start to the day with warm bright sunshine. Another good turn out to which we are always grateful.

Todays worthy volunteers: Alison, Amy, Steph, Holly, Cllr Vanessa P, Sarah, Pat, Andi,

Cllr Julie Baines,  Doug, Rachael, Geoff, Roger, Tony, Craig, David.

Before I start to do any more I must say that today we had many Tenants Lager Cans, Bottles of all sizes – glass, even a 3/4 bottle of vodka with gold pieces speckled through out.

The car park was that bad in between the mass of overgrown laurel bushes that some of the team did not see daylight as they were pulling allsorts from in between the undergrowth.

The team other wise went of into differing directions again. Up the road, down the road and across the road down the tracks,

Todays haul was as follows: 4 Tyres, Dinner Plates, 1 Fridge, 1 x 25 litre canister, 15…

View original post 108 more words

Rail Fare Campaign Day

Dear Friends,

Just a brief report on our involvement in the national Train Fare Campaign Day yesterday (3rd Jan. 2017). We had 14 members attend our event which meant that we were able to cover the Stourbridge Town shuttle entry in addition to 4 access points at Stourbridge Junction.

Stourbridge Labour members who participated came from from Cradley, Quarry Bank, Pedmore, Wollaston and Norton, plus a member from Dudley South joined us.

We started just before 6.30 am and finished at 8.15 am – but only because we ran out of our 1,000 leaflets!

We had an excellent reception from commuters and no hassle at all from the railway people.

It was a very successful morning and well worth the effort. More than 500 similar events took place across the country. The Daily Mirror also did a double page spread on the rail bosses taking millions in pay and bonuses. The Labour Party posted items on Facebook about our rail policies, plus #RailFail and #RailRipOff trended on Twitter.

I believe that we really made a difference yesterday and we were all upbeat and excited about what was achieved. For more, please visit the Action For Rail website.

Our next event is on Saturday 21st January when we will have a street stall in Stourbridge town centre. Details will be sent out via email as soon as we know more. Also, remember to check our online calendar every now and then. 

Best wishes,

Geoff Dixon
Secretary

Stourbridge Labour Party

c1o6q0axgaq5l6i15781118_621265611395184_7279401429214635241_n

Ann Black’s NPF Report (November)

image002Last month (19/20th November), the first National Policy Forum meeting in over two years was held in Loughborough. Given this, we thought it would be useful to reproduce a report of the meeting by NEC member Ann Black:

This was the first national policy forum meeting since July 2014 when we agreed our general election manifesto in a spirit of comradeship and optimism. Ann Cryer was elected as Chair, Shabana Mahmood as vice-chair from the MPs/councillors section, and Mick Whelan of ASLEF from the affiliates section, all unanimously. In the constituency section Katrina Murray was elected with 76 votes ahead of George McManus with 31 votes, four spoilt papers and some abstentions. I nominated and voted for George.

Jeremy Corbyn opened by stressing that the old certainties were falling away, and there was no more business-as-usual. Labour’s task was to restore hope and stand against divisions and hate crimes whipped up by the hard right. The Tories were taking Britain backwards, cutting £5 billion from adult social care and leaving 120,000 children in temporary accommodation. On Brexit, Labour would respect the decision of the British people, while ensuring full rights for European Union citizens in the UK and British citizens in Europe: people were not pawns. Labour would bring forward positive policies: creating a million good jobs, ending the undercutting of pay and conditions, a living wage of more than £10 per hour by 2020, rent controls and secure tenancies in the private sector, restoring employment rights from day one, scrapping tribunal charges, insourcing council services, ending privatisation in the NHS, placing conflict resolution at the heart of foreign policy, and safeguarding the future of the planet against climate change. We were ready for a general election whenever it was called.

Responding to questions, he promised that he and John McDonnell would re-issue letters to Labour councils to confirm that they cannot set illegal budgets, despite their dire situation. The blame lay squarely with the Tory government. He acknowledged low morale in the NHS, and agreed with the need to reduce prisoners’ reoffending rates. On migration, published figures were skewed by including students, many of whom returned home after qualifying, and tackling exploitation of workers from abroad was key to winning public support. Asked what Labour offered the 90% who were neither at the top nor the bottom, he said that everyone depended on good public services, and middle-class children were still living with their parents, unable to afford their own homes or pursue their chosen careers. Members agreed with his distrust of “progressive alliances” and asked him to persuade his shadow cabinet colleagues likewise.

Front Bench Presentations

Many shadow cabinet members attended, including Keir Starmer, shadow minister for Brexit. He said that most governments put national security at the head of their priorities, followed by jobs and the economy. Instead Theresa May had chosen, unforgivably, to make immigration the top issue. While Labour accepted the result of the referendum, the Tories had no mandate for the extreme form of Brexit currently being pursued, or for abandoning the single market, and their approach was confused and chaotic. Labour would continue to defend workplace, consumer and human rights in the negotiations to come.

Rebecca Long-Bailey, shadow chief secretary to the treasury, led a discussion on economic policy in the run-up to the autumn statement. Some Forum members suggested that November’s national campaign day should have focused on jobs and the economy, where Labour needed to improve on its 15% public confidence rating, rather than on health, where the party continues to score highly except for questions about where the money will come from. Perhaps next time.

Policy Seminars

The weekend allowed Forum members to discuss policy areas in detail, within the framework of Jeremy Corbyn’s ten pledges from his leadership campaign. The aim was to identify key priorities for debate through to 2020, but also to consider what our manifesto might include if an early general election was called. We could each attend four sessions, and I chose –

Work, Pensions and Equality. Debbie Abrahams, shadow secretary for work and pensions, outlined a vision for systems of social security which would be relevant to everyone. Labour would replace the discredited work capability assessments with personalised support for disabled people, and scrap punitive sanctions. This approach was welcomed, though members recognised the need for a compelling narrative which stressed that as children, parents, workers and pensioners, we all rely on social security at times. There were concerns about the steep rise in self-employment, and how much of it was voluntary rather than a way of removing people’s employment rights.

Labour had not yet taken a position on the triple lock, whereby the state pension increases annually in line with the consumer price index or average earnings or by 2.5%, whichever is the highest. The difficulty is that support for older people can be at the expense of younger people, paying high tuition fees, receiving lower pay and benefits, and unable to buy their own homes. Any change would have to be demonstrated as fairness across generations, where older people can see the value to their children and grandchildren. [update: on 29 November Rebecca Long-Bailey announced that Labour would maintain the triple lock through to 2025.] Equality was also important, with women hit disproportionately by changes in public spending since 2010, and the gender pay gap persisting.

Environment, Energy and Culture. Global warming emerged as a key theme, with strong support for renewable energy sources, and for better education on the extent of the dangers and the action necessary to avoid them. However there are differences within the Labour family on fracking and on the Hinkley Point nuclear power station, both of which are opposed by many activists, and at some point these will have to be reconciled. The importance of creative industries was highlighted, along with ensuring that cultural and sporting activities were available to all.

Justice and Home Affairs. This commission is responsible for developing policies on migration, and for keeping people safe at home, at work and in the streets. Labour’s police and crime commissioners, working closely with their communities, should play a key role. Cuts to legal and court closures were reducing access to justice, and violence to women and girls continued to be a major concern. Northern Ireland members pointed out that in their country women had no access to legal abortion even in cases of rape, incest or foetal abnormality. The 1967 Act did not apply, and women travelling to England had to pay for NHS services, though Scotland may offer to help them. I asked about party policy on allowing British citizens abroad to vote in UK elections. Currently this ends after 15 years, but the government are likely to extend their rights indefinitely. I was told that Labour opposed this move on the grounds that most expats were rich Tories, but Labour International take a different view, arguing that many are working abroad but retain close connections with the UK, and I hope that there is still time for debate.

International. Discussion ranged across Kashmir, Turkey, Syria, the Middle East, and the Balkans, understandably nervous about threats from Russia. Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry expressed regret that some Labour MPs did not vote for the motion suspending support for Saudi Arabia in Yemen until possible breaches of international law had been investigated. Forum members were appalled at Boris Johnson’s appointment as foreign secretary at a time when tact and diplomacy were at a premium, and were worried about the direction of United States policy. On Trident, Unite and the GMB restated their unconditional support for the jobs of their highly-skilled members who were involved in making weapons of mass destruction, while constituency representatives restated the majority of grassroots opinion on the moral, strategic and economic objections to replacement. However, having discussed the issue for eight months without resolution, the policy commission was not minded to continue indefinitely, and official party policy remains as at 2014: that Labour in government would conduct a full review of all aspects of defence and security, including nuclear weapons.

Next Steps

The results of all the discussions will be collated and discussed by the policy commissions, which will publish documents for consultation in spring 2017, hopefully before party meetings pause for local election campaigns. The NPF will meet again in summer 2017 to finalise documents for annual conference, where the new provision for referring back sections of documents will be given its first outing. The years 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 will see further revisions, with the manifesto signed off in spring 2020. However if there is a snap general election the joint policy committee will draw up contingency plans for producing the manifesto to an accelerated timetable.

In the meantime the Your Britain website has been revamped as http://www.policyforum.labour.org.uk/ and members, branches, constituencies and others are encouraged to post submissions and resolutions, and to comment on others’ contributions. I am on the work, pensions and equality commission, but happy for you to copy me in on everything.

Go to www.annblack.co.uk for Ann’s NEC reports.

How can the Labour Party influence the Brexit negotiations?

Richard Gupwell is the Stourbridge Labour Party’s Political Education officer. Richard has lived and worked in Brussels for the majority of the last 45 years and was a political adviser to the Socialist Group in the European Parliament. Reproduced below is a short extract from an essay Richard recently wrote on the Brexit process, focusing specifically on the Labour Party’s role. The essay was discussed at Stourbridge Young Labour‘s meeting on the EU on 6th December. 



How can the Labour Party influence the Brexit negotiations?

There are two main ways for Labour to influence the Brexit process. The first is to exert influence within the British Parliament – already being done with some success. This needs to be accompanied by an effective public campaign to criticise the Conservative Government’s inept handling of the whole Brexit business.

 

However, the Party can also exert influence with Labour’s allies in Europe, both in the European Parliament and in the Council and the European Council.

 

The Labour Party belongs to the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S & D) in the European Parliament, which has 191 MEPs, second only to the Group of the European People’s Party (EPP), which has 221 MEPs. There are no British MEPs in the EPP group but 20 Labour MEPs in the S & D Group. The other political groups are all in the second division. The Conservatives and Reformers have 70 MEPs (including 19 British Conservatives and 1 Ulster Unionist), the Liberals and Democrats have 67 MEPs (with 1 British Liberal Democrat), the United and Nordic Left Group have 52 MEPs (including 1 Sinn Féin member), the Green/Free Alliance have 50 MEPs (including 3 British Greens, 2 Scottish Nationalists and 1 Welsh Plaid Cymru member) and the Freedom and Direct Democracy Group have 48 MEPs (including 24 UKIP members). There are also 52 non-attached MEPs (including 1 Democratic Unionist from Northern Ireland).

 

The Council of Ministers and the European Council are dominated by the EPP, the S & D and the Liberals and Democrats. These three political families between them control three-quarters of the seats in the European Council, the remainder being made up of Conservatives (Britain and Poland), the Far Left (Greece) and independents. Thus, in the rest of Europe, the Labour Party and, indeed, the Liberal Democrats, are able to exert far more influence that the present British Conservative Government, which has few allies. Indeed, apart from UKIP, it could be said that the Conservatives are the party least likely to be able to obtain “the best possible deal for Britain”.

 

Jeremy Corbyn recently attended a meeting with other European Socialist leaders in Prague. It is encouraging that the Labour Party is concerting its policy on Brexit with its European partners and that a European Socialist conference has been proposed by Labour to take place in London in the near future.

Richard Gupwell

socialistsdemocrats_en

A Message from Siôn Simon

In six months time (4th May, 2017), the first ever election for a West Midlands Mayor will be held. It’s an election we absolutely have to win.

Right now, so much is at stake for the schools, hospitals and public transport services that we rely on. As Labour’s candidate to be the first West Midlands Metro Mayor, I want to invite you to join my campaign.

We’re just getting started and we’re building our team. Members win elections when Labour wins elections. Our people have shown time and again – in places like Wolverhampton where we saw off the Tories in May 2015 – that Tory cash is no match for the talents, commitment and passion that we in Labour possess when we pull together.

This election is between a local Labour Mayor – always putting the West Midlands first – or a Tory candidate dancing to the tune of a Conservative government that has let our region down. They have starved our NHS of the cash needed to run our hospitals, ignored our housing shortage and returned our children to overcrowded classrooms.

Together – with our distinct identities, our shared history and our combined economic clout – a  Labour Mayor for all the West Midlands can be a powerful leader for Wolverhampton, Walsall, Sandwell, Dudley, Solihull, Birmingham and Coventry.

Thank you,

Siôn and the campaign team.


labour-mp-sion-simon

  • Join Siôn Simon’s team here if you are able to help out in any way. 

Labour Party Conference 2016: Our Delegate’s Report

First of all, thank you to the General Committee members who nominated me to be their delegate for the Labour Party conference in September. May I also take this opportunity to thank Pete Lowe and Geoff Dixon for looking after me and guiding me through conference.

As your delegate I attended the leadership announcement on Saturday and met Dennis Skinner MP. I spent some time meeting other delegates and trade unionists to talk about disability issues. I also listened to Andy Burnham’s speech and Tom Watson’s speech – both were inspirational.

Outside of conference I attended two fringe meetings – ‘Disability in the Workplace’ and ‘Opening up your CLP to Disabled Members’. Both fringe events were chaired by my good friend Dave Allan from Disability Labour. I attended Red Wedge with Anna Joy Jones and Peter Jenner, former manager of Pink Floyd and Billy Bragg. I also went to the Labour Animal Welfare Society karaoke with Pete, Geoff and Ellen and Rachel Cobb. A good night was had by all!

Jeremy Corbyn’s speech on Wednesday was excellent. It inspired me to get campaigning and to make the key points to our voters, and I returned to Stourbridge with a spring in my step.

– Craig Greenwell, Stourbridge CLP disability officer and delegate to conference.

Cllr Cathy Bayton at Conference

Stourbridge didn’t have any speakers at conference this year (Liverpool, 25-28 September). However, local councillor Cathy Bayton – our friend and delegate for neighbouring Dudley South CLP – spoke about adult social care. Here is her insightful contribution:

I see at first hand the crisis hitting adult social care. As a councillor at surgeries, families raise with me their very real concerns about the standard of care their loved ones receive, and as a trade unionist I see staff under paid and exploited with appalling working terms and conditions.

Conference, it is time to take social care out of the market place and put the needs of service users at its heart. Since 2010, Dudley MBC has seen a loss of £27 million in real terms in spending on people. Demand has risen for services, with a population increase among 65–84 year olds of 11%, and among over 85s of 25%. What does that mean for services? Janet, a Dudley South CLP member, told me her 89 year old mother-in-law who has dementia has been attending a day centre run by a national charity four days a week. This gives her independence, stability and stimulation, and her family the peace of mind that she is cared for. The cost of this service is set to increase to £35 per day! This is to offset the funding cuts to the charitable sector inflicted because of this government’s continued ideological attack on local government. Dudley Council – a Labour controlled council – should not be in the position of having to cut services to the most vulnerable in our society.

Now lets consider the staff in this sector. Toxic zero hours contracts, fixed term and temporary contracts, less than the minimum wage when you calculate travel time and sleeping-in time, and – following the uprating of the minimum wage across the care sector – terms and conditions are being slashed. The removal of occupational sick pay, loss of shift allowances, removal of car allowances and reduction in holiday to the statutory minimum… Conference, we need a Labour government to put value back in care.

I call on the next Labour government to put a halt to this race to the bottom, to give our vulnerable and frail adults dignity and care, and those who care for them the professional credibility and value that they deserve. I also urge the leadership to seriously research the positive impact an unconditional basic income would have on the lives of these staff.

 

Neena Gill on the economy and Brexit

We have seen that the economy grew during the months leading up to the EU referendum, albeit at a slower rate than predicted. We also saw a surplus of £1 billion in July, the first full month since the referendum. However, this fell short of what was expected with economists previously predicting that it should have been nearly double that at £1.9 billion. This means that the Government could fail to meet its borrowing target by nearly £20 billion. The numbers simply mean that the Government will push more and more austerity measures on to hard working families.

Whilst there are some promising signs, it is too soon to tell what the real impact of Brexit will be. All the leavers who are boasting about the ‘Brexit lie’ must understand that the real impact of leaving the EU won’t be fully felt until Article 50 is triggered. That is why we need real direction from the treasury. With the UK Parliament only just returning from the summer break there has been little movement. Most economists still maintain that there will be an economic downturn even if it is just in the short-term, so we need to understand how to weather the coming storm. I am meeting with small businesses and consortia across the West Midlands to understand their needs so we can try and minimise the damage to the lives of normal people.

If you have any questions please get in touch with my team who will be happy to assist you.

Neena Gill MEP

Taken from Neena Gill‘s September newsletter. Neena is one of two Labour MEPs for the West Midlands. She is @NeenaGmep on twitter.